Put The X Back In Sex

​“For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.”
---2 Timothy 4:3-4
​

In my younger days, an elder once looked me and said: “Some of the smartest people I’ve ever met are the dumbest people I know.”

He made this remark right after a room full of people I admired and respected asked me to share my thoughts on a subject. I didn't have much to say on the matter and told them what I thought they wanted to hear. He saw right through me and called me out for my bullshit.

When he made his remark, I was immediately embarrassed. I didn’t say a word the rest of the meeting. Still, I really had no idea what he was trying to convey to me when he said what he said.

This was well before I had accepted Jesus Christ into my heart and asked His forgiveness for my sins. Since that day, the message the gentleman at the conference table was trying to convey has become clearer and clearer: simply going through the motions and trying to fit in had exposed me to be an idiot as well as a fool.

I mention this story because a senior Bishop of The Church of England recently wrote that there is “no official definition” of a woman. Additionally, there was little to no pushback from his peers within the Church’s legislative body.

Worse still, the British Royal Family hasn’t condemned the statement. In fact, Crown officials may in fact have sanctioned or encouraged the Church's position on the matter.

Much like a Pope, the British Crown controls the Church and has a foothold on their doctrine. The reigning monarch holds the title of Supreme Governor within the Church. That means church doctrine follows the guidance and direction of the Crown.

You don’t need to be an educated theologian to define the word woman. Any reasonably intelligent child whom has attended Sunday school classes can point to the Book of Genesis and offer a reasonably accurate answer.

So why are some of the most well-educated people in all the world flummoxed when asked the question? And why do many of these same people seem to believe that it is genetically or spiritually possible to change one's sex?

​More to the point, why aren’t more men and women who recognize the lies, deception, and subterfuge guised as gender theory and ​transgenderism standing up to vanquish these evils?

Much of the answer lies in the entomology of the word gender itself. We’ll discuss the origins of the word and the evils that have twisted the meaning of the word from its origin in this article.
 

WHAT'S IN A NAME?
The word gender is rooted in Latin, and it originally meant "descended from" " or "father of" depending upon the usage.

During the 13th and 14th centuries, derivatives meanings sprouted up in both France and England during the Hundred Years War. The derivates were dialectical and accompanied slang terms meant to disparage enemy combatants and their progeny based on their mannerisms and inherent genetic qualities.

Hatred toward the enemy filled the hearts of many members of the nobility on both sides during the war and intensified as the campaign dragged on. On the battlefield, captured soldiers were often sissified and sometimes tortured by the enemy. Additionally, when villages were plundered by invading forces, women were often raped, and the children sometimes buggered. Consequently, the language used to describe the opposition often compared them to animals and frequently alluded to physical characteristics deemed weak or inferior.

As time passed the genus of the word continued to evolve; and during the Protestant Restoration period the slanderous terms actually turned inward within the aristocracies of England and France.

Under King Henry VIII of England and Francis I of France, both nations underwent radical changes within the military and government ranks. Poorer and less educated citizens were looked down upon with distain much the same way Rome’s nobility had their own people under the Republic. A pecking order was established within the aristocracies somewhat akin to the primates of the animal kingdom.

This was especially true within England’s military ranks. King Henry was a distrustful man who ruled much by fear and wrath, and his leadership style permeated the entire British empire to a degree. Within the military’s established order, the lower ranks often behaved like jackals.

England’s church was also subjugated to the Crown during this period. Henry looked down upon the clergy and truthful men were frequently mocked openly within the royal court.

In France, King Francis venerated the Roman Catholic Church and had an inordinate love for art and culture. Like Henry, he ruled with arrogance, and denigrated anyone who resisted his edicts with wrathful vengeance.

France’s university system grew considerably during his reign; and educated sycophants spent inordinate amounts of time postulating meaningless theories to esoteric questions in order to curry favor with the King.

Henry VIII and Francis I both frequently denigrated members of their own courts who dared to challenge their authority in front of an audience. Chastised officials would often take their fear and frustration out on their staff in return.

Aristocrats who gained favor with their respective King wielded immense power. Lust, envy, and wrath abounded as the aristocracy jockeyed for favor. Unscrupulous aristocrats were known to bribe the servants of their rivals to dig up damaging truths such as their sexual proclivities. When no dirt could be found, the wicked sometimes fabricated stories.

Rumors of sinful behaviors were often spread deliberately within the royal courts. As these rumors spread, they were often embellished, and generalizations about the individuals engaged in the alleged behaviors began to emerge.

As the gossip swirled, entire groups of people were labeled and categorized based on their associations with the individuals targeted by the rumors. Commonalities they shared with one another, such as the schools they attended, their vocations, leisure time activities, and region of birth were disparaged.

These rumors and innuendos were often spread deliberately through the populace. Animalistic slang terms emerged from the gossip describing these individuals and their families; and prejudicial generalities were applied to their characters. These were gender stereotypes.

Men and women stereotyped with gender labels were considered inferior to the aristocrats who maintained their King’s favor and kept their reputations clean. Prideful aristocrats would often opine about rivals who were on the outs with the King in order to bolster their popularity with the Crown and with other aristocrats.

Wit and charisma became rapacious weapons; and stigmatized individuals had a difficult time defending their honor against the gender labels that stuck.

This parallels much of what we’re witnessing within academic circles and amongst the Western world’s political elite today. Cloistered political animals browbeat rivals with differing opinions and pigeonhole them with slanderous terms like "racist" and "transphobic".

Ironically, they also propagate and openly encourage a variety of classist gender labels to stratify the populace and sow division.
 
​
IF SOMEONE TOLD YOU JUMP OFF A CLIFF WOULD YOU DO IT? 
A good many college professors, business leaders, and elder statesmen have forsaken their souls and surrendered to sin. Like the aristocrats of Henry VIII’s and Francis I’s courts, they serve very dark masters and are willing to appease them at any cost. Some are so drunk on their own delusions, that they truly believe the impossible is true.

Genetically speaking, it is IMPOSSIBLE for a man to become pregnant, nor the male of any other species for that matter. Therefore, men CANNOT menstruate or give birth. Yet, within established academic circles these preposterous theories are gaining merit.

Similarly, it is IMPOSSIBLE to change one’s sex. Chromosomes are determined AT conception. Therefore, Surgical procedures and hormone therapies MUTILATE the body you were blessed with by birth. Still, the American Medical Association, and other recognized medical boards around the world condone these evil practices.

It’s unsurprising really. We are living in decadent times and minions within the media laude both theories. Western civilization is nearly two generations removed from the horrors of grand warfare, and our children have been pampered with amenities since VJ Day.

In large part, the wealthiest and most influential among us have broken through the first three foundational layers within Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs and rejected God in the process. They are consumed by one or more of the Seven Deadly Sins and have overly important senses of self, hang-ups with their parents and elders, and/or hatred for their fellow man.

Most modern parents have rebelled from sound Biblical teachings and pursued their own selfish interests. That’s why homosexuality is actively promoted in schools, young girls are now being forced to dress with males taking hormone shots to change their appearance, and drag queens are being paraded in front innocent children for idol worship. 

Not to mention the fact that acceptance of child rape is being openly debated on a handful of college campuses under the auspices of gender theory

WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
More and more parents are waking up and realizing just how evil our schools’ educational curriculum has become. That said, they are facing an uphill battle because a number of politicians, business magnates, and high-level government bureaucrats are embracing gender theory in a calculated power-grab. A handful of corrupt religious establishments have joined in as well.

With three generations of children now well-poisoned by excess, the wicked are hedging that they can contaminate the most recent crop of voters around the globe and tip the scales in Satan’s favor.

Labeled Generation Z by academics, the latest generation of voters have never known a world without the internet or social media., and have largely live a sheltered existence. They have little to no understanding of totalitarianism, and they are falling prey to the many of the same lies and fallacies that swept over the continent of Europe following the Conference of Versailles; albeit in a different and more concentrated flavor.

Throughout history, the wicked have played words games to deceive the innocent, fool the naive, and corrupt the willing. They have twisted definitions, made habits of coining new terms and benign-sounding catch phrases, and invoked fear with evocative language. They fill people’s heads with pollution and cloud the air with controversy to distract attention from the evil they perform away from the crowd.

The Board of Trustees of both Oxford and Cambridge are good examples. Both universities once published what are arguably the most authoritative English language dictionaries in all the world, and they have forsaken their souls for silver in the digital age.

Their publishing houses have restricted access to their online dictionaries to a great degree, and both require subscriptions to access understanding of the world's predominant language.

That said, the subscription models for the two are quite different. Oxford requires subscribers to pay an annual subscription fee. The fee runs $100 for U.S. subscribers or £100 for subscribers outside the U.S. This is well beyond the average means of the unemployed and the public at large: a deliberate attempt by wealthy and powerful individuals to suppress human achievement and suck the souls from the poor.

Cambridge’s model is more nefarious. The publisher requires subscribers to provide their email address or a social media account to gain access to the dictionary in full. The publishing house and their affiliate partners then collect all of the keystroke information entered under the subscription and use it to build psychosocial profiles on each and every subscriber.

The keystroke information and the profiles are stored in cloud-based computing systems, where it is bought, sold, traded, and bartered by wicked opportunists. Beyond advertising and solicitation, the information they obtain is sometimes used for grifting schemes, discrimination, political oppression, and sport.
​
Compounding matters further, neither publishing house offers to sell the public a hardbound copy of their dictionaries through their websites. This means that a handful of academic elites can manipulate or change the definitions and meanings of words at their will; and ordinary subscribers outside elitist circles are none the wiser.

A KEY TAKE-AWAY
It should be noted that Oxford and Cambridge both have theological roots and that they were both incorporated by the British Parliament in 1571 under Queen Elisabeth I's rule. The scholastic activities and the curricula at both universities were bound to the crown to a wide degree at this time.

They still are for that matter. Both universities are pipelines for government jobs and royal cabinet positions. From within the Crown’s inner circle, corruptible young men and women are placed within the schools to do the Crown’s bidding.

A similar activity occurs here in the United States at Harvard, Princeton, and Yale on behalf of the the Federal Reserve. As odd as this may sound, the bulk of the debt the U.S. federal government incurred to defeat the British during the Revolutionary War was owed back to the Crown; and we borrowed heavily from the Monarchy again when we moved off the gold standard in 1913.

These five universities (plus the University of Vienna) largely dictate educational curriculums within the Western hemisphere. This means that that the British Crown has played a part in facilitating all of the politically correct gender theory nonsense elitist institutions have thrust upon humanity in recent years.

Through marriage, the British Crown has built alliances with wealthy and powerful political players around the world over the centuries (most notably in France, Germany, and Australia). In concert with America's ruling class, these elites are fueling gender hysteria within the free world and sowing discontent amongst the middle and working classes across the globe.

SUMMARY 
In his novel 1984, author George Orwell outlined the future planned by the ruling class to a great degree. Like King Herod, they are using their wealth and power to usher in authoritarianism,  tyranny, and evil around the world. At best, this is direct power play. At worst, it is outright idolatry.
​
Christ teaches us that the meek are blessed in spirit.  The wicked have recognized this long ago and altered the meaning to their liking. ​​

Many of the  wealthiest and most powerful families among us are deliberately deceiving the public as they prepare to usher in an unholy global war of epic proportions. They intend sit back, watch the world burn, and then reap the rewards of the seeds they have sown.

May the bravest among them repent before that day of judgement arrives.

​“For the fate of the sons of men and the fate of beasts is the same. As one dies so dies the other; indeed, they all have the same breath and there is no advantage for man over beast, for all is vanity.”
---Ecclesiastes 3:19

​Author: Erik Gagnon - Managing Partner, Chi Rho Consulting